An intense diplomatic meeting room where Indian Foreign Minister S. Jaishankar is addressing international journalists and diplomats about the arrest of three Indians in Canada, with a large digital s

Hardeep Nijjar’s Death | S Jaishankar Responds to Arrest of 3 Indians in Canada: ‘Will Wait for…’ – Hindustan Times

The Context Surrounding Hardeep Nijjar’s Death and Subsequent Developments

The death of Hardeep Nijjar, a prominent figure within the Sikh diaspora in Canada, has sparked controversy and diplomatic conversations between India and Canada. Nijjar, who was also a Canadian citizen, was reportedly killed in a shooting incident outside a Sikh temple in Surrey, British Columbia in June earlier this year. His death has raised significant concerns about cross-border terrorism and international law enforcement cooperation.

Background on Hardeep Nijjar

Hardeep Nijjar was known as a leader in the Sikh community in Surrey. He had been vocal about Sikh political issues and was described as an advocate for the Sikh independence movement, often termed the Khalistan movement. This advocacy had placed him in a controversial position with the Indian government, which has long viewed the Khalistan movement as a threat to its sovereignty and national security.

The Allegations and Canada’s Response

Following Nijjar’s death, allegations surfaced regarding the potential involvement of foreign entities. Canadian authorities, leading their investigation, have been cautious in directly implicating any country without conclusive evidence. However, the incident significantly strained the diplomatic relations between Canada and India, especially concerning discussions around terrorism and political asylum.

Arrest of Three Indians in Canada

In a significant development, Canadian law enforcement recently arrested three Indian nationals under suspicions related to the assassination of Hardeep Nijjar. These arrests have potentially linked the incident back to Indian authorities, raising questions about international law practices and the complexities of geopolitical pressures on diaspora communities. However, the details of the evidence against these individuals have not been made publicly available at this time.

India’s Stance and S Jaishankar’s Response

Reacting to these developments, Indian External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar made statements regarding the arrest of the three Indian nationals. While he did not directly comment on the government’s involvement or knowledge about the incident, he emphasized the importance of due process and the need for a thorough investigation before jumping to conclusions.

Implications of Minister Jaishankar’s Statement

Will wait for… were the words chosen by Jaishankar, indicating a cautious approach from the Indian government. This stance suggests that India is potentially preparing for diplomatic fallout, should the investigations link the Indian state to the incident. It also underlines the complexities involved in international criminal cases, where evidentiary standards and legal processes vary significantly across countries.

International Reactions and the Road Ahead

The international response to this case has been varied. Leaders from various nations have called for a transparent investigation into Nijjar’s death and the fair trial of the arrested individuals. There are calls within the international community to uphold human rights standards and ensure that political biases do not cloud judicial processes.

As the situation unfolds, the Sikh community in Canada and globally watches closely, concerned about the implications of this case on their safety and the perception of their political struggles. Furthermore, the outcomes of this investigation could influence Canada-India relations significantly, potentially impacting issues related to trade, migration, and diplomatic cooperation.


The death of Hardeep Nijjar and the subsequent legal developments involve a complex interplay of national security, international law, and human rights. As the investigations proceed and diplomatic conversations continue, the international community remains keenly observant of the respect for legal processes and the broader implications for international relations and diaspora politics.


No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply